solaris27
08-07 09:13 AM
no
wallpaper Weeds: Super Silas to the
reddymjm
01-22 01:35 PM
It would be nice if we can co-ordinate and do it in all Major cities at the same time.
jennym
09-20 12:28 PM
The couple applied for the green card together. The husband applied under the EB1 category and his wife also applied with him as dependent. The green card of the couple has been approved and is expected to arrive in a month's time. The wife is not in US currently. She is outside US. Will the husband get his green card & the wife's green card in his wife's absence? Will there be any complications in the husband's green card in this case?
It is urgent. Please reply as soon as possible.
It is urgent. Please reply as soon as possible.
2011 images Watch Weeds Season 6
CADude
09-19 05:44 PM
NO. Read USCIS FAQ
Hi all,
I am resident of CA and have my I140 application approved from Nebraska. My I485 application was filed in TSC. Is this a issue since according to USCIS, CA residents should file in the NSC. Will my I485 will be rejected because of this issue.
Thanks
Hi all,
I am resident of CA and have my I140 application approved from Nebraska. My I485 application was filed in TSC. Is this a issue since according to USCIS, CA residents should file in the NSC. Will my I485 will be rejected because of this issue.
Thanks
more...
raju_abc
12-08 11:41 PM
I think you need to reapply for H1 again (unless you are transferring your visa category to H4).
Hi,
thanks for the answer.
but i am not tranferrig to H4.
Hi,
thanks for the answer.
but i am not tranferrig to H4.
Blog Feeds
07-02 04:30 PM
On June 26, 2009, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that the current edition of the Employment Eligibility Verification Form I-9 (Rev. 02/02/09) will continue to be valid for use beyond June 30, 2009. USCIS has requested that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approve the continued use of the current version of Form I-9. Once the extension request is approved, USCIS will update Form I-9. At that time, employers will be able to use either the Form I-9 with the new revision date or the Form I-9 with the 02/02/09 revision date.
Read more here.. (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=31b3ab0a43b5d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1RCR D&vgnextchannel=db029c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD)
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/06/update_on_new_i9_form.html)
Read more here.. (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=31b3ab0a43b5d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1RCR D&vgnextchannel=db029c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD)
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/06/update_on_new_i9_form.html)
more...
tamroi
October 28th, 2004, 11:58 PM
http://imageevent.com/publicgallery/photography/candids000 (http://imageevent.com/publicgallery/photography/candids000)
has some of my candid photos, numbered from 1 to 75.
I'm trying to show an "optimum" collection,
and so I'd really appreciate your listing here the numbers of some of the ones which you think I might as well omit, and any other suggestions.
Another really big favor would be to point me to some candids on the web. They're not easy and they seem not to be very popular.
Thanks a lot for any feedback. tamroi
has some of my candid photos, numbered from 1 to 75.
I'm trying to show an "optimum" collection,
and so I'd really appreciate your listing here the numbers of some of the ones which you think I might as well omit, and any other suggestions.
Another really big favor would be to point me to some candids on the web. They're not easy and they seem not to be very popular.
Thanks a lot for any feedback. tamroi